Scrolls and books have this in common with architecture: they are containers. They are containers that define space that holds objects. The difference between them is a single dimension. While architecture is volumetric and thus able to contain three-dimensional objects, scrolls and books can only contain two-dimensional marks. But all three offer a temporal experience.
The book is a container constructed of strictly defined compartments. It is a fixed group of rooms; precise, static, closed. Each is a compact box, and each box can be reached from any other box. That is why the book is so spatially dense and efficient: it has no circulation space.
In contrast to the book, the scroll is really only one room, or maybe not even a room but rather a long passage. The scroll is all circulation. It is a long corridor. Ironically, ironically because it is such an old format, the scroll offers a spatial continuity that is quite modern, even organic. It offers uninterrupted movement through space, a freedom to roam.
The book and the scroll complement each other. It is strange that the scroll has been essentially abandoned as a format. It offers spatial qualities that are not like that of the book. The book is a heterogeneous space, made up of numerous little independent parts. The scroll is a homogeneous space; single, unified, whole.
Recent Comments